| FREE
Teaching Aids for One-Week Sessions or Full Semester Online
Courses in | ||
Persuasion
Analysis
by Professor Hugh Rank
Simple ways to analyze complex persuasion techniques |
||
|
Overview
-- Updated: June 12, 2008 Pattern recognition gives us some way to sort, some place to store, and some help to cope better with a persuasion blitz. This site emphasizes the most common pattern of commercial ads (The Pitch) and a less common, but very significant, pattern of political persuasion seen in the rhetoric of "cause groups" (The Pep Talk) Both patterns, however, are smaller parts of an elegant, comprehensive taxonomy -- the Intensify/Downplay schema offering other common sense ways to organize, to classify and to analyze incoming information about advertising and political language. OBSERVE, in persuasion, that all people intensify some elements, downplay others. HOW we intensify (by means of repetition, association, composition) and how we downplay (by means of omission, diversion, confusion) are techniques common to all. For example,
under a broad category of Intensify / Composition / Structure,
the most common structural pattern seen in ads is "The Pitch."
One-page classroom reprints with a WHAT
we intensify and downplay, furthermore, depends on our role and behaviors
in the persuasion transaction between benefit-seekers and benefit-promisers.
Simple graphics can alert us to other predictable patterns. For
example: As benefit-promisers, a different quadrant diagram can show how we all intensify our own "good" and downplay our own "bad"; furthermore, in aggression, we also intensify others' "bad" and downplay others' "good." Two counter-propaganda
axioms are noted. Since
1973 (as original Chair of NCTE's Committee on Public Doublespeak), I've
created simple teaching aids to analyze complex contemporary persuasion.
My schema was meant to be non-directive, descriptive, useful
for various goals. But it's so huge that many teachers (short on time
and training) asked for help: where to start? It all fits together, but
for most users, I'd prescribe my directive: start with the basic
1-2-3-4-5 pattern of the pitch we see in everyday ads .
|
Tools
for Younger Students Advertising is the easiest starting point to analyze any persuasion techniques. Most ads are relatively simple in structure, easily available, and in the coherent packages as they were created. Suitable for middle school and high school are two fully-developed online units about ads -- The Pitch and The ABCs of TV Ads: The
Pitch The
ABCs of TV Ads Related
1-pg classroom passouts
Why analyze ads? Why analyze political rhetoric? Because there's a growing imbalance between the professional persuaders and the average persuadees. This site seeks to counter-balance this increasing inequality between the few and the many. In a free society, we must expect persuasion from all different sources. In a democratic society, we must prepare all individuals to be aware of basic techniques used by all persuaders. Caveat: Although I advocate the fair academic analysis of ads, I also advocate against the unfair commercial intrusion of Channel One into the inappropriate venue of classrooms. Persuasion Analysis http://faculty.govst.edu/pa/index.html hughrank@verizon.net |
Tools
for Older Students < First, check
out The Pitch and the related 1-pg passouts (center list):
most are useful by anyone. Political rhetoric Political rhetoric is much more difficult for most people to analyze, not only because it involves more emotional issues, but also because it is more likely to be seen in bits and fragments, often filtered or edited by others. Students are urged to get accustomed first to analyzing the patterns within commercial persuasion. Yet, ultimately, the analysis of political rhetoric is more important. As ordinary citizens, you and I will never have access to insider information, nor have the time or ability to deal with all of the complexities of a political campaign. So, analysis of these basic patterns of persuasion has limited value: it doesn't tell us which side is "right," what charges are "true," what supporting evidence is reliable, or what to do. But, such basic pattern analysis does help us to do some basic sorting out -- in a detached and systematic way -- of some very complex emotional arguments: to identify the examples, to recognize past history, and to define the key issues. Three major topics here: Election Rhetoric "Cause
Group" Rhetoric: The Pep Talk Related 1-pg PDF classroom passouts Most are self-contained; all relate to online materials: "Images & Issues" - 1 epitome sentence Why Analyze Political Language? Not-So-Great-Expectations (context) 200 Questions You Can Ask... Common Complaints... Pol. Language Counter-Propaganda Axioms Lakoff's "Society as Family" metaphor |